Jump to content

Talk:Jean-Paul Sartre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can we lock this article?

[edit]

I have noticed that this article seems to be a frequent target of vandalism. I recently reverted a change (see the revision I made on 24 November 2023) which promoted the claim that Jean-Paul Sartre stated a belief in God while on his death bed, a claim that has no credible evidence. After looking through the history of this article to find the original author of said addition, I found to my amazement that the change was made all the way back in October of 2021. The fact that an unsubstantiated paragraph of text can survive two years on such a significant philosopher's Wikipedia article without seemingly anyone noticing is alarming to me.

For this reason, and because of a history of other occurrences of vandalism on this article, I would like to open a discussion for locking this page. Stephanos100 (talk) 05:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too late apparently. By the time it's gotten like this and no correction has been forthcoming the existing content has a defacto consensus. Not really important that the enwiki article as is like this since Sartre is one of the most discussed thinkers of the last 2 centuries and no srs reader is going to take wikipedia as authoritative. If there's a ring of truth, you could say the ring of half truth and distortion is pretty clear here. The distinction between crowd sourced and scholarly content curation. Try Stanford Philosophy Encyclopedia. Lycurgus (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the sexual abuse section be 'alleged'

[edit]

It's all written as if this is 100% confirmed (i.e. 'Sartre did...') when as far as I'm aware it's not entirely confirmed. Ofc I'm not defending his actions, but shouldn't it be necessary to use phrasing like 'Sartre allegedly did' rather than treating it like it's something known for definite. 2A00:23EE:2770:2CAD:D8FD:4ACD:ECD2:EE99 (talk) 21:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]